Speculation about future robots

All emboldenment, links and referencing added.

 

Introduction 

 

  1. Speculation about future robots “using human atoms” to become more human-like often sounds provocative.
  3. It’s a concept that sits right on the edge of science fiction and existential horror. When people speculate about robots "using human atoms," they are usually touching on a few distinct (and increasingly plausible) scientific paths.
  5. While the idea of a robot "eating" people for parts is a trope of dystopian cinema, the actual scientific discussion is often more nuanced—and in some ways, more fascinating.

 

  1. 1. The Biological Hybrid (Cyborg Systems)

 

  1. The most literal interpretation isn't about scavenging atoms from existing humans, but rather incorporating biological matter into mechanical frames.
  3. Bio-hybrid Robotics: Researchers are already growing living muscle tissue on robotic skeletons. These "bio-actuators" are more energy-efficient than traditional motors and can self-heal.
  5. The "Atom" Connection: To grow these tissues, scientists use the same building blocks humans use: amino acids, glucose, and oxygen. In this sense, the robot isn't "using human atoms" by stealing them, but by being built from the same organic chemistry.

 

TOP

2. The Molecular Assembly Argument

 

In nanotechnology, there is a concept called Molecular Manufacturing. If a future robot is built from the bottom up using individual atoms, it doesn't matter where those atoms come from.

  1. An atom of carbon from a piece of coal is identical to an atom of carbon from a human skin cell.
  3. The speculation here is often more philosophical: If a robot is composed of the exact same atomic arrangement as a human, at what point does the distinction between "machine" and "organism" disappear?

 

3. The "Ship of Theseus" Scenario

  1. This is the reverse of the "Killer robot" trope".
  3. It suggests that humans might become more "robotic" by replacing our biological parts with synthetic ones until we are entirely mechanical—yet still composed of the atoms we started with.
  5. The Paradox: If we replace every neuron in your brain with a synthetic atom-for-atom duplicate, are you still "you," or have you become a robot using "human atoms"?

4. Why this speculation persists

This idea taps into our deepest fears and fascinations for a few reasons:

 

  1. Resource Scarcity: The "Grey Goo" theory suggests nanobots might consume all organic matter (including us) to replicate.
  2.  
  3. The Uncanny Valley: We feel an instinctive "creepiness" when machines mimic us too closely. Using our literal biological building blocks is the ultimate expression of that mimicry.
  4.  
  5. Transhumanism: The desire to merge with technology to achieve immortality.
  1. A Scientific Reality Check
  3. In reality, using human-derived atoms or tissues is incredibly inefficient. Silicon, steel, and carbon fiber are significantly more durable and easier to source than biological material. A robot "eating" humans for atoms would be like a car "eating" other cars for scrap metal—it's much easier to just go to the mine or the factory.
  5. source

 TOP

Roger Penrose has plenty to  say.

Roger Penrose

Roger Penrose
Sir Roger Penrose (born in 1931) is an English mathematician, mathematical physicist, philosopher of science and Nobel Laureate in Physics.    He is the Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor of M…

Microtubules

Microtubules
ChatGPT thinks about microtubules   What is the Penrose brain theory?   What do microtubules do in consciousness?   What is the Penrose paradox?   What is Roger Penrose's the…

WE HAVE REACHED MICROTUBULES!

WE HAVE REACHED MICROTUBULES
…them more human-like re Penrose microtubules. The concept of creating robots that utilize human atoms, particularly in the context of Penrose microtubules, opens fascinating…

----------------------------------------------

Conversation with Gemini Google

You said

Speculation about future robots

 

In 2026, we’ve moved past the "cool demo" phase of robotics and into the era of Physical AI. 2nd link The speculation of the early 2020s has solidified into a world where robots aren't just programmed with rigid code, but "trained" using the same large-scale neural networks that power LLMs.

Here is the current landscape of speculation and reality regarding our robotic future.

1. The Humanoid "Inflection Point"

We are currently in what experts call the "Humanoid Milestone Year." For the first time, general-purpose robots are moving from labs to factory floors and pilot homes.

  1. The Big Players: Tesla’s Optimus Gen 2 is preparing for mass production, while companies like 1X (NEO) and Figure AI are deploying robots that can learn tasks by simply watching a human do them.

  3. The Goal: By the 2030s, the "Bill of Materials" cost for a humanoid is expected to drop to roughly $15,000–$20,000, making them cheaper than many cars.

  5. Speculative Leap: Some analysts suggest that by 2060, there could be 3 billion humanoid robots globally, effectively doubling the "working population" to handle labor shortages in aging societies.TOP

TOP

 

2. From Programming to "Teaching" (VLA Models)

The biggest shift is the move toward Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models.

  1. The Change: Instead of a software engineer writing 10,000 lines of code for a robot to "pick up a cup," a user can simply say, "Hey, grab that mug and put it in the sink."
  3. Self-Correction: Robots now use Agentic AI to reason through mistakes. If a robot drops the mug, it doesn't freeze; it evaluates the mess and decides whether to pick up the pieces or get a towel.

3. The "Weak Robot" Movement

While everyone is chasing "superhuman" robots, a fascinating speculative trend is the rise of "Weak Robots."

  1. The Concept: These are robots designed to be intentionally slow, cute, or even "clumsy" to lower human anxiety and encourage social interaction.

  3. Utility: Instead of an intimidating metallic soldier, imagine a "trash can robot" that wanders a park and "asks" for help with its lid. Research suggests humans are more likely to trust and assist robots that show vulnerability, leading to better integration in public spaces.

4. Workforce Evolution: Displacement vs. Reinstatement

The math on jobs is becoming clearer, and it's a "good news, bad news" sandwich:

  1. Displacement: Estimates suggest upwards of 300 million jobs could be significantly altered by 2030. Roles in warehousing, basic accounting, and retail are seeing the fastest shifts.

  3. The "Reinstatement Effect": In a twist, plants that adopt robots are actually seeing employment growth. As productivity rises, these companies expand, creating a "complementary" demand for human roles—though these roles now require more troubleshooting and "human-in-the-loop" management.

 

TOP