This is the original report with NO extensions.

Read it with extensions

Most readers should click the link otherwise there's lots of reading twice.

-------------------------------------------

 

Priority Description Possible Solutions


H 1

On the Home page, below the first greeting  “Best Wishes and enjoy the site.”

More button opens a new tab on google and
automatically searches “A Facilitator leads
the reader to the information, but it cannot
learn it or apply it.”

This seems like a mistake and should lead
the reader elsewhere.

This is a high priority because the home page
is a user’s first impressions of your website.  It is difficult to understand
where the more button should lead the reader.

Therefore, options include:  Remove the button - Lead the user to another page on your site (maybe
About Us page) -

 

Lead the user to a specific site rather than a google search (only if you
know what the button should do)

 

-------------------------------------------

 

H This information is relevant to the “About AI” page.

Before the contents section, there are many
buttons such as “Learn more about Alan”
and “Explore the dialogue”.

It seems none of these sections of the page
are buttons. They may be images but these
are aspects of the page that makes the user
think there’s a button but in reality none of
these buttons do anything.

On this page under 9 AI overview we see the
same issue for “source” – It looks clickable
but does nothing!

The same issue occurs in section 10 and
section 11. - Assign these
buttons to take
users to specific
places. - Add a link to the
source of 9. AI


Overview. - Add a link for the
source in 10. - In section 11 either
remove the blue
text (blue is usually
an indication of a
hyperlink so users
want to try and click
it) or add links to
redirect users to the
relevant info.

TOP

-------------------------------------------


M When visiting the Hercules intro page via the more button on the

home page the “here” in “Hercules is a white robot as you see here.”
Takes the user to the home page of the site.

Furthermore, the page needs more
information – It has a good introduction but
needs a paragraph below for more detail
about Hercules.

The description says the robot is white
whereas the image shows a brown robot. - Reassign “here” to
where it should lead – something about Hercules maybe? 

 

Or remove the link so instead users can infer the image to the right is
where “here” refers to.

Add more information about Hercules. - Replace image to a
white robot /replace description to a brown robot so they match.

 

-------------------------------------------


N/A CLARIFICATION ON AMAZON ORDERS OF ROBOTS.

You mentioned that users can click the amazon link and then order using your details.

This most likely isn’t the case – Amazon have intensive security measures in place to
prevent things like this.  No action required.  The link DOES NOT log users into your account.

Providing a link to a product will send them straight to amazon.co.uk.

Many amazon users have a “remember me” option enabled – so they don’t have to log in
every time they want to order a product.

It is likely that during your testing, this process occurred, logging you in to your
account on amazon automatically.

To clarify, you were automatically logged into your amazon account, but other users will
automatically be logged into their own account or remain signed-out.

TOP

-------------------------------------------


M On the Home page there is a description leading beginners to “sitemap”.

On this new sitemap page the following redirect buttons do not work correctly.

- 1. Home - All links under section 4. A Graphic guide.


Correct links behind the
redirects to lead to the
correct page.

Currently the user sees a
404 error – page not found.
L FAQs redirect source to wrong place.

Source in Q. What is Artificial Intelligence
sends user to a new google search rather
than a source for the info.

The last question: “Some main characteristics of AI?” – All links lead to a
google search.

 

Although in this scenario it may not be considered “incorrect” it does
look less professional if to answer the questions they have to read through a google search.

Correct source link to lead to a specific source i.e article/page the information was taken from.

Think about if you can answer the questions that lead to a google search on your own website
somewhere and lead them there instead. This retains user engagement to your site.

-------------------------------------------

M On the “About Us” page there is still a
placeholder.

“Add your Heading Text Here”- This can be found below the main body of the page and is
in blue - Simplest solution is to remove this header. - If you have a purpose for this
header, then you can alternatively replace it with a title/text of your choice.

TOP

-------------------------------------------

L On page “The goals of AI” – majority of
sources again lead to a google search with an
auto entry for the search. Eg “AI and dualism”
is thrown into a google search and the user is
left on a google search page trying to figure
out where your source of information has
come from.


Replace all source links to
lead to the correct source
of the information you
used.

TOP

-------------------------------------------


L On the page for beginners there are also a
few sources that lead to a google search. This
need changing.

You do have other links that lead to a google
search, but these ones work well. For
example, “13. Is google offering free AI
courses?” – This leads the user to a google
search with that phrase (perfect place to find
out!).

However other links can be improved: Just
below the above-mentioned phrase you
attempt to redirect users to free workshops.
Again, there’s nothing “incorrect” about the
process you use to do this, It just might be
easier and more intuitive for users to be lead
to a specific free workshop offering. Perhaps - Fix source links


- Consider finding a specific workshop to redirect users to instead of a google search.


Consider the same reasoning for all links in your website that lead to a google search.


Think “Can I take the user to a specific site/page instead?”

find something fitting and put that link in
instead.

2.1 Learn more- redirects users to a google
support page. This takes priority over the
other link corrections because the other
ones at least currently take users to a google
search / page with some relevance.

Here you are redirecting them to a google support page
so they will think something has gone wrong. - Priority – Fix the 2.1


Learn more to
redirect the user to
somewhere where
they can learn
more.

-------------------------------------------


L Under the “All Contents” page.

The TOP button located at the bottom of the
page has a twitter logo.

This seems weird and perhaps a mistake as it
may confuse users as the buttons use has no
link to twitter.

You could either:
- Remove the twitter
logo and just have
the word “TOP”
- Replace the twitter
logo with an up
arrow or other
appropriate
diagram.

TOP


L On the “Contact Us” page there again is a
source link leading to a google search rather
than an article/page you actually sourced the
information from.

Another thought is that this page should not
include the current text. Instead, maybe a
similar sized body of text inviting users to
contact you for whatever reason.

It’s important to keep the contents of the
page relevant to the use of it. This page is
designed to give users access to you rather
than give them more facts/information about
AI. The below text seems misplaced on the
site:

“As AI technology advances, intelligent
agents powered by large language models
are opening up opportunities for
astronomers to explore the universe more
effectively and unlock its mysteries.” - If you wish to keep
the current text then replace the source link to the
correct source. i.e article/page. - If you agree that the
paragraph doesn’t fit with the contact page then you can
either remove it or replace it with an invitation for users
to get in contact!

 

TOP